Monday, 2 July 2012

Education - Past, present and future

Education should be the pinnacle of our society, schools should look like palaces, they should employ the best teachers from across the world, they should support the best teachers from within the UK, they should house the resources required to teach a pupil but also to let the pupil teach themselves until their heart is content, they should contain up to date technology to make learning easier and more fun, they should stock every pieces of sports equipment imaginable and they should also have every musical instrument known to man. In other words no expense should be spared on education because primary and secondary education are the highest levels of education that many young people will attain and their chances of an excellent education shouldn’t be hindered by a lack of anything.

Every government past and present will tell you that education is the bedrock of our society and many of the cures to the worst diseases the world has ever seen will come from those within our educational establishments.
I wholeheartedly agree with this statement, but in doing so I do not want to marginalise the many thousands of young people who will not get places in the country’s top universities.
Having done a cursory search of jobs, the vast majority of well-paid jobs require the candidate to have a degree in some form. Whilst some of these jobs have a specific use for the candidate’s degree, many have none and simply require the degree as a sign of intellectual ability.
I have no problems with children growing up wanting to be doctors, lawyers, scientists or fulfilling any other dream requiring a degree; I do however have a problem with people discouraging people from careers that do not require degrees simply because those positions are seen as unimportant.
HGV drivers are the back bone of the nation ferrying goods from distribution centres to our shelves, they don’t need a degree, mechanics keep the HGV’s on the road, they don’t need a degree, and the store assistant stacks the shelves making sure that the desired goods are on the shelves, they don’t need a degree.
We need to accept that not everyone wants a degree, or wants a job that requires a degree and that it’s ok for our children to take jobs they have a natural interest in rather even if they do not need a degree to do the job. Whilst we all want the best for our children, we must help and guide them in their education and career choices rather than forcing our own ambitions on them. I want every person to achieve what they want to achieve, no more and no less.
Education shouldn’t stop after we leave full time education; education should be something that we can return to at any time whether we are twenty seven or seventy. Many people discover throughout their career that they would rather be doing something else, but do not have the means to take the life changing step and switch careers, sometimes through lack of education or qualifications.

This results in a demotivated employee who only works at forty or fifty per cent capacity and results in an ineffective work force. If someone wants to change their career in to something they are naturally interested in then we should take every step to help them.
I will look at ways of making higher education available for those who have left full time education and have taken up full time employment. I do not believe such education should be free, but I believe that it should be affordable and should make use of technological developments to drive down costs whilst maintaining the quality and standard of the education offered.
Twitter? Why not post me your questions : @ThePMCandidate
The Candidate

Islamic Extremists?

If you go to Google and type ‘extremist definition’ it offers a definition. It says “A person who holds extreme or fanatical political or religious views, especially one who resorts to or advocates extreme action”

In our society today we seem to be caught up with the notion that extremism comes solely from Islam and the Islamic faith. Extremism have existed for many thousands of years in many different forms and I suspect will continue for thousands of years to come. Islamic extremism is merely one section of an otherwise much larger problem.

There will always be people in our society that hold extreme political views and fanatical religious views; the very idea that the sixty two million people in the UK share the same opinions on anything goes against the very grain of our humanity and our individual intelligence. This difference of opinion is what makes us diverse, healthy and progressive in our nature, the real danger however comes from those who are willing to result to more than just words to further their own agenda.

There are a great number of neighbourhoods across the world that live under the constant threat that the public bin they walk past every day could just explode, or the car that they have parked next to is filled with explosives.

In the 1800’s we believed that the answer to stopping crime was to lock those responsible away and make the subject to hard labour, no great surprise that crime still exists within our society. In the 1920’s in America, the eighteenth amendment was changed to ban alcohol, unsurprisingly in the 1930’s alcohol was legalised again when that ban failed because people were creating their own at home or in visiting ‘speakeasy’s’.

These times in history are relevant to the extremist problem we face today. In the 1800’s hard work and jail didn’t reform the criminal mind; it simply punished the body for its actions. In the 1920’s the ban on alcohol pushed the trade underground. It still existed, it was harder to detect for the authorities but the vast majority of the public were aware of their presence.

In our modern society there are as many reasons as there are people as to why people choose to become extremists but we must also understand that there are instances where extremists are created not by their own choice and free will but by education and more appropriately brainwashing.

If we are ever to rid our society of extremists who are prepared to use deadly force to pursue their own agenda then a number of things need to change. We as a nation need to stop identifying people as terrorists because of a skin colour, because of their religion or because of their appearance alone.

This method of identifying possible terrorists from their appearance or beliefs only serves to build barriers in already fraying communities and where there were limited communication; such barriers could prohibit any form of communication completely. This breeds itself in to a cycle of fear between divided communities that cycle will destroy our communities as a whole and our national identity as well as irreparably damaging the lives of the individuals in the communities.

Pandering to terrorists is not the answer, however morally and ethically we owe it to ourselves, our neighbours, our communities and to the few who have fought to preserve the rights of the many to try and put in a place a programme that is designed to work with those who are at risk of being radicalised irrelevant of their religion or skin colour.

For those who have been radicalised but would like to seek help, it should be provided, but for those whose sole aim is the taking of life and the destruction of property, then we owe it to the public at large and the world to make sure these people are never allowed to set foot in public again.

Within current legislation a number of offences already exist around terrorism. Where a person is convicted by a court of being involved in terrorism, then that person should receive a minimum term in prison of no less than fifty years.

Extremists may have some legitimate concerns; however there are processes and channels that can be utilised to raise their concerns and terrorism is not one of those options.

Twitter? Why not post me your questions : @ThePMCandidate

The Candidate

Friday, 29 June 2012

Taxation and Social Benefits System

The taxation system and benefits systems are extremely complicated and difficult to work out. Various arms of government carry out various functions, from the collection of revenues, to the payment of benefits and these arms of government rarely speak to each other.

Therefore, this lack of communication fails to identify those claiming benefits illegally whilst working, those paying too much tax, those paying not enough tax and those who are eligible to claim tax relief but are not aware.

This is why we propose the following:
     ·         A full review of all current taxes, such as PAYE, national insurance contributions, business rates, council tax, corporation tax, value added tax, tobacco tax, fuel tax - this review will ensure the tax rates are appropriate and that the tax itself is still relevant
    ·         The creation of one government body responsible for the collection of taxes and the payment of benefits
    ·         The creation of a new computer system documenting the taxes due and eligible benefits
    ·         With the new computer system would come an online function whereby people would be able to calculate personal tax and make payments online
Twitter? Why not post me your questions : @ThePMCandidate
The Candidate

Welfare State

Since its introduction in the early 1900's the welfare state is a key an important part of what makes our country great. Our welfare state allows everyone the peace of mind that in the event that they do lose their job, then there are a series of benefits in place to make it easier for people and families to manage during the downturn.

That said, the welfare system was only intended as a temporary solution to manage short term problems. In today's society the very essence of people spending all of their adult’s lives on benefits is a very real prospect and this is not the spirit in which the welfare system was created.

We are certain there are people abusing the welfare system and taking advantage of loopholes in the system. They are more than happy to sit at home and spend tax payer’s money whilst others in society carry out a fair days work for a fair days pay.

There are people in society that will only accept jobs in certain roles or with certain titles, but in a society that is working together, if you cannot find a job within six months then why should the state provide you with benefits because you can’t find a job with the right title. There are times when we can choose the job we want and there are other occasions when we have to take any job that comes our way.

This is why we propose the following:
     ·         Someone claiming unemployment benefit will be able to claim for a maximum of six months at which point benefits will be stopped
     ·         After the initial period of six months has elapsed the person will not be eligible for any further unemployment benefits until a period of twelve months has passed
     ·         No changes to child benefits
Twitter? Why not post me your questions : @ThePMCandidate
The Candidate

Review of Constituencies

The Conservative government have commenced a process of reviewing the current constituency boundaries. They are looking to reduce the number of constituencies from 650 to 600. I actively support this as it will make each constituency more equal in terms of voter numbers.

The only difference we would make would be to remove the Prime Minister from being elected to a constituency. The Prime Minister is responsible for the overall running of the government of the day and because of this I believe it is irresponsible to all parties concerned that the Prime Minister should be representing a constituency as well as the country. To me it seems there are obvious conflicts of interest.

Therefore we propose the following:
     ·         Reduction in the number of constituencies from 650 to 600 all with an equal n umber of voters
     ·         The leader of the party with most votes in the general election is elected as Prime Minister
     ·         Upon being elected Prime Minister, they are no longer MP for a constituency with voters, rather they are an MP for a constituency without voters
    ·         MP's are responsible for issues and concerns within their constituency
    ·         The Prime Minister is responsible for national issues, concerns as well as foreign affairs
Twitter? Why not post me your questions : @ThePMCandidate
The Candidate

Tough on Crime

One of the age old complaints from the general public is that offenders once convicted are not given hard enough sentences to represent the seriousness of the offence they have committed.

Across the board there does appear to be a disparity in sentencing too, for example for breach of a court order you can look at a short custodial sentence, but for being convicted of disqualified driving on the third time you’re looking at an extended ban and potentially community service.

We believe the only way to really get to the root cause of this is to provide minimum and maximum sentences for all serious and commonly committed offences. This will help standardise the punishments handed out making it fairer for those subject of the punishment, but also all Magistrates and Judges the flexibility to hand out sentences within the guidelines which they feel are appropriate.

One of the most common punishments handed out to convicted criminals is community service. I for one have never been able to identify who these individuals are and from that I am not sure whether I have seen them carrying out the community service. I think its essential that the public see those who have committed criminal acts making amends for their actions, that is why we believe they should be visible and when carrying out acts of community service they will have to wear an orange boiler suit.

Whilst there are critics out there who say this amounts to a breach of Human Rights as it may be deemed as degrading, I do not believe this is the case. The reason they are wearing the boiler suit is to help staff supervising Community Service easily identify who is with them and who is the general public. In any case I would expect this to be challenged in court.

From this we propose the following:
· Minimum and maximum sentencing for all serious and commonly committed offences
· Those carrying out community service will be made to wear an orange boiler suit
· Communities will be able to work in conjunction with the local probation office to decide where to place those on community service to ensure the community makes the most out of their time
Twitter? Why not post me your questions : @ThePMCandidate
The Candidate

Prime Ministers Questions

Prime Ministers Questions (officially known as Questions to the Prime Minister but abbreviated to PMQ's) has existed in parliament since 1881. This is a chance for MP's to ask the Prime Minister questions about the activities of the government, policies and also current events.

PMQ's takes place in the House of Commons and starts at 12 o'clock every Wednesday whilst government is in session. PMQ's lasts for 30 minutes. Whilst I appreciate the need to have questions from MP's to the Prime Minister, I also feel that we are lacking questions from the public.

I believe the public should have their fare share of questions to the Prime Minister also to ask questions about government activities which affect the public at large. I also believe that in addition to asking questions in person, there should also be other mechanisms to canvass the Prime Minister.

Therefore I propose the following:

     ·         Public Prime Ministers Questions - Each week the Prime Minister will visit a different location and answer questions from the general public for 30 minutes
     ·         All e-petitions with over 100,000 signatures will be refered to the Speaker of the House. From there the Speaker will look at the petition and say whether the item being petitioned has been or will be discussed, if it has or will be discussed then this information will be made available through the e-petitions site. If it has not been discussed and is not due to be discussed then the Speaker of the House will schedule a session
     ·         An online version of Questions to the Prime Minister will be created for the public to pose questions
     ·         The introduction of 'Meet the Prime Minister'. These will be one to one conversations between the public and the Prime Minister and will take place during various journeys and the public can ask anything they want
On Twitter? Why not post me your questions : @ThePMCandidate
The Candidate